WASHINGTON: The war over the war exploded anew here Wednesday. Advocates and spin masters for the presumptive presidential nominees launched into battle after Senator John McCain, when asked whether he now had a better idea when U.S. troops could return home from Iraq, replied, "No, but that’s not too important."

http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/06/11/america/campaign.4-286458.php

Is the attack plan for the United States onto Iran true? And do we have any more credible evidence besides a Russian writing on article? We know how spin works in America, we invented new politics. I don’t know the author of this nonsense from Adam and was just curious on how it would even be possible if the U.S. lacks the funds in Iraq to launch a whole new campaign.

In this article,

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070715/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq

Titled Aide: Iraqi PM’s comments misconstrued
The first paragraph is basically just saying what the headline says,

the next TWO have nothing to do with the headline but talk about car bombs and insurgent tortured bodies and one of our soldiers dying (May he rest in peace).

Then the story just picks back up where it left off.

Is this a form of brainwashing, spinning, decietfulness? Don’t get me wrong, the public has a right to know these things, but what does that have to do with this story?

I think that they put this stuff in all articles because we wouldn’t read a story JUST about car bombs. So they feed it to us like a pill you hide in mashed patatoes from your child.

What do you think?

Why are the liberals so upset by it? Why can’t liberals see the news from a conservative’s point of view and admit there is a liberal bias? I’ve read articles from newspapers about soldiers who recently died in Iraq and they spin the article from honoring a fallen soldier to make it into a Bush bashing. Is that right for the family of the soldier?

Excerpts:

WASHINGTON (AP) – Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama was less than upfront in his half-hour commercial Wednesday night about the costs of his programs and the crushing budget pressures he would face in office.

Obama’s assertion that "I’ve offered spending cuts above and beyond" the expense of his promises is accepted only by his partisans. His vow to save money by "eliminating programs that don’t work" masks his failure throughout the campaign to specify what those programs are—beyond the withdrawal of troops from Iraq.

A sampling of what voters heard in the ad, and what he didn’t tell them:

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D944H6EO0&show_article=1

Do you agree with this, or are they simply demonstrating anti-Obama bias like most of the MSM? HA!